Background
Historically Arab members of the UN have used the General Assembly (GA) as a forum for
isolating and chastising Israel. | "...the United Nations has long been a forum for political attacks against Israel ... " | With support from third-world nations, the Non-Aligned
group and others, the Arab states have had little difficulty passing harsh anti-Israel
resolutions through the GA. Even today, the strength of these forces in the world body
allows them to continue rebuking Israel. This is demonstrated each year at the opening
session of the GA when the Arab members challenge the credentials of the Israeli
delegation.
For decades, the Security Council has also participated in singling out Israel by
passing one-sided resolutions charging Israel with sole responsibility for human rights
violations, violence and deportations. On the other hand, Palestinian and other Arab
violations and involvement with such incidents are rarely criticized, or even noted by the
Council.
Several UN committees and divisions of the Secretariat, which primarily serve the
interests of the Arab nations that encouraged their creation in the 1970s, are also
extremely critical of Israel. Among these are the Division for Palestinian Rights of the
Secretariat, the Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices in the Territories, and the
Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People. Israeli
officials have termed these committees "propaganda instruments" of the PLO.
Some UN agencies have also exhibited anti-Israel sentiments. For example, between 1974
and 1987 the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
instituted financial sanctions against the Jewish State, | "...this
resolution was part of an effort led by a coalition of Arab states ...
to delegitimize Israel ... " | passed hundreds of resolutions
criticizing Israels activities on the West Bank, and denounced Israels
archeological and restoration efforts in Jerusalem.
Among the most harmful UN anti-Israel resolutions was the notorious resolution equating
Zionism with racism, passed in November 1975 by 72 to 35. It said that Zionism is a form
of racism and racial discrimination... [and] is a threat to world peace and
security." But more than being a response to the ideology of the Jewish state, this
resolution was part of an effort led by a coalition of Arab states, and the Soviet Union,
to delegitimize Israel and create solidarity against a perceived Western domination. The
resolution was finally repealed in 1991, following the Madrid Conference.
Although the United Nations has long been a forum for political attacks against Israel,
in the 1960s and 1970s two resolutions were passed which, in later decades, became the
cornerstone of Middle East diplomatic efforts. On November 22, 1967, following the Six Day
War, the Security Council passed Resolution 242 with the stated intention of providing a
solution for the conflict in the Middle East. This resolution called for the withdrawal of
Israeli armed forces from territories occupied during the Six Day War, in exchange for the
"termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and
acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of
every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized
boundaries free from threats or acts of force."
Similarly, Resolution 338, passed on October 22, 1973, in the midst of the Yom Kippur
War, called for the termination of the ongoing armed battle and for negotiations to begin
between Israel and her Arab neighbors on the land-for-peace premise of Resolution 242. In
calling upon the Arab states to end their war against Israel, and to engage in direct
peace talks, an effective framework for the future peace negotiations was produced at the
UN.
|