Letters to the Editor
Tampa Bay Times
To the Editor:
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg succinctly summed up the fallacy of Wednesday's majority decision striking the Section 4 preclearance formula from the Voting Rights Act when she wrote: "Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet."
Immediately after the ruling, officials in Mississippi and North Carolina — jurisdictions formerly covered by Section 4 — said they will move ahead with controversial and problematic changes to voting rules. Freed from preclearance requirements, such changes will likely suppress minority voting, as well as result in long and costly litigation.
In 2006, Congress reauthorized the Voting Rights Act with overwhelming bipartisan support. It must once again join together to remedy this critical blow to one of the most important and transformative civil rights laws of the 20th century.
Florida Regional Director