Coalition Letter to Indiana Governor Regarding Inclusive Hate Crime Legislation

Related Content

March 13, 2019

In a letter to the Governor of Indiana, ADL and a broad coalition of national civil rights advocacy organizations expressed deep concern with Senate Bill 12, which if enacted, would create a weak, vague and unacceptable state bias crime law.

March 7, 2019

The Honorable Eric J. Holcomb
Office of the Governor
200 W. Washington Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

Dear Governor Holcomb:

We, the undersigned organizations, are part of a broad-based coalition of national civil rights advocacy organizations that represent a multitude of racial, ethnic, interfaith, disability, and multicultural communities across the country. We write today, in many cases in support of the efforts of our state and local affiliates, to offer you facts around Indiana’s Senate Bill 12, and to urge you to consider the implications of potential enactment of an unacceptable vague and weak state bias crime law in Indiana. We unanimously agree that, in 2019, to be taken off any list we maintain and promote of states without a hate crime law, a bill must be specific, clear, and include a comprehensive list of enumerated characteristics. 

Furthermore, we have serious concerns that an over-generalized bill, such as Senate Bill 12 is currently drafted, could actually cause harm by being used to further marginalize communities of color and minority religious communities, the exact opposite of the bill’s original intent. 

Indiana reported 85 bias-motivated crime incidents in its 2017 Bias Crime Booklet, prepared by the Indiana State Police Department. These incidents were motivated by a variety of biases ranging from race, sexual orientation, religion, disability, and national origin. A critical component of any enforceable bias crime law is the specific enumeration of those groups specifically targeted for bias-motivated violence. This has become increasingly apparent in Utah, where that state’s hate crime statute does not include enumerated categories. We know that Utah has been identified in Indiana as a viable example of an alternative approach, but we should not look to Utah as a model for replication. Numerous commentators – including prosecutors and law enforcement officials – have recently concluded that Utah’s law is virtually unenforceable because it lacks specific enumeration. Legislative efforts to update that law to include specific enumeration are underway and being supported by many of our organizations. 

Just two weeks ago, Mustafa Ayoubi, an Afghan and Muslim American, was followed off a highway exit into an apartment complex where his attacker shouted anti-Muslim and antiimmigrant slurs before fatally shooting Ayoubi. His attacker, and so many others, cannot be charged with a hate crime without comprehensive legislation that includes specifically enumerated protected characteristics. As bias crimes continue to rise across the U.S., government surveys indicate that more than half of incidents continue to go unreported. Despite these alarming trends, some opponents of an Indiana bias crime law continue to erroneously argue that specifying categories in legislation will lend ‘special statuses’ to minorities. This notion is simply false. Inclusive hate crime statutes are designed to cover everyone; anyone intentionally targeted because of their personal characteristics would be protected in a hate crime statute which includes enumerated categories. Indeed, bias crime statutes must outline specific identities to be constitutional and to provide clear legal guidance for law enforcement officials and prosecutors investigating these crimes and enforcing the law. 

We strongly agree with Governor Holcomb’s sentiment expressed in his January 15 State of the State address that, “Standing strong against targeted violence motivated to instill fear against an entire group is the right thing to do.” We urge all members of the Indiana General Assembly to continue in your commitment to enact a strong bias crime law and, to ensure its effectiveness, to make clear your support for a law which includes specific enumerated categories. 

We stand ready to provide you any assistance or support you may require to be successful in that endeavor. 


American Jewish Committee

Anti-Defamation League

Arab American Institute

Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law

Bend the Arc Jewish Action

Center for the Study of Hate & Extremism – California State University, San Bernardino

Hindu American Foundation

Human Rights Campaign

Interfaith Alliance

Japanese American Citizens League – Hoosier Chapter

Japanese American Citizens League

Jewish Community Relations Council of Indianapolis Jewish Council for Public Affairs

Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law

Matthew Shepard Foundation

Muslim Advocates

Muslim-Jewish Advisory Council

Muslim Public Affairs Council


National Black Justice Coalition

National Center for Transgender Equality

National Council of Jewish Women

National Disability Rights Network

National LGBTQ Task Force Action Fund

Orleans Parish School Board

PFLAG National

People for the American Way

Sikh Coalition

South Asian Americans Leading Together (SAALT)

Southern Poverty Law Center

Union for Reform Judaism

Women of Reform Judaism