Luis Alvarez | Getty Images
Related Content
A syllabus shapes how a course frames knowledge, discussion, and acceptable viewpoints. Reviewing it carefully can help identify whether a class supports open inquiry - or risks promoting bias, including antisemitism.
Balance of Assigned Readings
Examine the diversity of sources and viewpoints.
Watch for:
- Readings that overwhelmingly present one political perspective
- Absence of Israeli, Jewish, or pluralistic scholarly voices in relevant syllabi
- Use of activist materials presented as uncontested academic analysis
Why it matters: A university classroom should expose students to competing ideas, not a single narrative.
Use of Language and Definitions
Pay attention to terminology used in the syllabus.
Watch for:
- Terms like “settler-colonial state,” “apartheid state,” or similar labels presented as settled fact rather than debated claims
- Lack of distinction between criticism of Israeli policies and broader claims about Jewish identity or legitimacy
- Language that generalizes or essentializes Jews or Israelis
Why it matters: Imprecise or loaded language can blur the line between legitimate critique and discriminatory framing.
Framing of Israel and Jewish Identity
Look at how Israel and Jewish topics are introduced.
Watch for:
- Language that presents Israel as uniquely illegitimate among nations
- Descriptions of Zionism solely as racism, colonialism, or oppression
- Erasure of Jewish historical, religious, or cultural ties to Israel
Why it matters: When Jewish identity or Israel is framed in a one-dimensional or delegitimizing way, it can exclude Jewish perspectives and discourage open discussion.
Treatment of Controversial Topics
Consider how difficult issues are introduced and structured.
Watch for:
- No guidance for respectful discussion of sensitive topics
- Assignments that require students to adopt a specific political position
- Lack of space for dissenting viewpoints
Why it matters: Students should be able to engage critically without pressure to conform to a single ideological stance.
Inclusion and Classroom Climate Expectations
Review policies on participation and inclusion.
Watch for:
- Missing or vague statements about respectful dialogue
- No acknowledgement of religious or cultural diversity, including Jewish identity
- Participation policies that could penalize students for expressing minority viewpoints
Why it matters: Clear expectations help ensure all students - including Jewish students - feel safe contributing.
Alignment with Institutional Standards
Compare the syllabus with university policies.
Watch for:
- Content that may conflict with university non-discrimination policies
- Inconsistency between stated institutional values and course design
Why it matters: Courses should reflect the same standards of inclusion and fairness upheld by the university.
Resources
- Dispelling Common Anti-Zionist Myths and Allegations
- Antisemitism Uncovered
- Questions, Complexities and Context: Insights into Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
- What Is… Antisemitism, Anti-Zionism, Criticism of Israel?
Key Principle
Criticism of any country - including Israel - is a legitimate part of academic inquiry. However, when criticism becomes one-sided, delegitimizing, or excludes Jewish perspectives entirely, it risks crossing from debate into bias.
How to Use This Resource
- Students: Use this checklist when selecting courses or raising concerns
- Faculty: Ensure syllabi reflect balance, rigor, and inclusivity
- Administrators: Support consistent standards across departments