Georgetown University

Campus Antisemitism Report Card > Georgetown University

Georgetown University

2026
Grade

B

Jump To

2026 Report Card

Publicly Disclosed Administrative Actions Above Expectations
Jewish Life on Campus Excellent
Campus Conduct and Climate Concerns High

Georgetown has a Hillel, Chabad, and Jewish Greek life organizations.

Litigation & Investigations

In July 2025, Georgetown Interim President Groves testified before the House Committee on Education and Workforce about the University’s handling of antisemitism on campus.

What’s Happening on Campus?

In February 2024, more than 100 students, faculty, and staff held a walkout on campus, calling for Georgetown to divest from companies that invest in technology used by the Israeli military. The walkout was organized by several groups, including the Georgetown Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and JVP chapters. That same month, JVP led a protest against a panel featuring Israeli Defense Forces soldiers.

In October 2024, anti-Israel graffiti was located on campus that included an inverted red triangle, a symbol associated with Hamas.

In April 2025, a BDS referendum passed in the student government with 68 percent of the student vote. That same month, a poster advertising a Jewish candidate for student government at Georgetown was vandalized with graffiti that read: "Zionist."

In June 2025, during the Iran-Israel war, a Georgetown professor posted a tweet calling on Iran to strike a U.S. military base. That same month, swastikas were found etched into pillars on the Georgetown University campus.

University Policies and Responsive Action

In Spring 2023, an external antisemitism briefing was organized for a group of administrators, including University Counsel, Office of Emergency Management, Student Equity and Inclusion, and others that advise the President.

Since October 2023, senior academic and administrative leaders across Georgetown’s campuses have met regularly with Jewish students, faculty, and staff to discuss ways in which the University can strengthen Jewish life on campus and prevent and address antisemitism, which has led to the development and introduction of new programs, trainings, and the Community in Diversity public awareness campaign against antisemitism, Islamophobia, and all types of hate.

In January 2025, Georgetown launched mandatory educational training for more than 700 leaders of campus student organizations regarding understanding and preventing discrimination and harassment based on protected categories, including antisemitism.  Georgetown also requires all first-year undergraduate students to complete educational training regarding understanding and preventing discrimination and harassment based on religion, race, color, and national origin, including shared ancestry, such as Jewish identity. In addition, Georgetown conducted a cultural climate survey of students during the Spring 2025 term, which included questions regarding students’ sense of belonging, including related to their Jewish identity; experiences involving bias, prejudice, and discrimination, such as antisemitism; and University resources and responsiveness.

Georgetown’s Center for New Designs in Learning and Scholarship (CNDLS) has developed extensive resources to help faculty promote civil discourse and facilitate difficult discussions in the classroom. In addition, Georgetown has launched the Georgetown Dialogues Initiative (GDI) that seeks to give all Georgetown students exposure to and personal experiences in respectful dialogue between those with opposing viewpoints. Furthermore, the University released a toolkit on Engaging in Civil Discourse at Georgetown, which showcased past events and current strategies for engaging in challenging discussions with people across political ideologies, race, faith traditions, and other backgrounds.

When the April 2025 BDS referendum passed in the student government, the administration acted within 30 minutes to issue a public statement rejecting the referendum outright and reaffirming the University’s opposition to the BDS movement. In July 2025, the University removed the professor who had posted the tweet about Iran from his role as department chair, placed him on leave, and initiated a formal review.

In advance of the 2025-26 academic year, Georgetown adopted a new masking policy, addressing a growing tactic of harassment.

Criteria

Above Expectations

Publicly Disclosed Administrative Actions i

Key
Publicly Disclosed Administrative Actions
This college completely fulfills the specified criteria
This college partially fulfills the specified criteria
This college does not fulfill the specified criteria
This college was not assessed on the specified criteria.
Full ADL Criteria Details →
Antisemitism included in Code of Conduct and Policies
Clear process for reporting antisemitic incidents
Advisory council to address antisemitism/support Jewish life
Clear religious accommodations policy
Mandatory antisemitism education for students, faculty and staff
Has an official position against BDS
Publicly condemns antisemitic incidents
Partnerships with Israeli institutions
Conducts research to assess Jewish campus community experiences
Civil discourse initiatives on campus
Has Title VI office and/or coordinator
Policies prohibiting masked harassment
Policies prohibiting encampments and event disruptions
Excellent

Jewish Life on Campus i

Key
Jewish Life on Campus
This college completely fulfills the specified criteria
This college partially fulfills the specified criteria
This college does not fulfill the specified criteria
This college was not assessed on the specified criteria.
Full ADL Criteria Details →
Active Hillel, Chabad, or other Jewish student organization
Jewish Greek life
Jewish studies programs
Kosher dining
Interfaith initiatives on campus
School promotes awareness of Jewish holidays
Israel studies or study abroad programs
Rabbi/Jewish educator
Jewish religious services
Jewish alumni group
Has a group supporting Jewish employees
Partnerships with Jewish-allied organizations
Active pro-Israel group
High

Campus Conduct and Climate Concerns i

Key
Campus Conduct and Climate Concerns
This college has no recent reports of these issues
This college experiences some of these issues
This college experiences a lot of these issues

*Incident levels reflect the number of incidents relative to the total student population on campus. 'Severe' and 'other' incidents were only counted if they were recorded between January and December 2025.

Full ADL Criteria Details →
Level of severe antisemitic and anti-Zionist incidents
Level of other antisemitic and anti-Zionist incidents
Level of hostile anti-Zionist student government activity
Level of hostile anti-Zionist student groups 
Level of hostile anti-Zionist faculty government activity
Level of hostile anti-Zionist staff and faculty activity

Georgetown University contributed information to our assessment.

This page was last updated on Mar 10, 2026, 5:15 am

Campus Antisemitism Report Card > Georgetown University

Georgetown University

2025
Grade

B

Jump To

2025 Report Card

Publicly Disclosed Administrative Actions Above Expectations
Jewish Life on Campus Excellent
Campus Conduct and Climate Concerns Medium

Georgetown has a Hillel, Chabad, and Jewish Greek life organizations.

Litigation & Investigations

In July 2025, Georgetown Interim President Groves testified before the House Committee on Education and Workforce about the University’s handling of antisemitism on campus.

What’s Happening on Campus?

In February 2024, more than 100 students, faculty, and staff held a walkout on campus, calling for Georgetown to divest from companies that invest in technology used by the Israeli military. The walkout was organized by several groups, including the Georgetown Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and JVP chapters. That same month, JVP led a protest against a panel featuring Israeli Defense Forces soldiers.

In October 2024, anti-Israel graffiti was located on campus that included an inverted red triangle, a symbol associated with Hamas.

In April 2025, a BDS referendum passed in the student government with 68 percent of the student vote. That same month, a poster advertising a Jewish candidate for student government at Georgetown was vandalized with graffiti that read: "Zionist."

In June 2025, during the Iran-Israel war, a Georgetown professor posted a tweet calling on Iran to strike a U.S. military base. That same month, swastikas were found etched into pillars on the Georgetown University campus.

University Policies and Responsive Action

In Spring 2023, an external antisemitism briefing was organized for a group of administrators, including University Counsel, Office of Emergency Management, Student Equity and Inclusion, and others that advise the President.

Since October 2023, senior academic and administrative leaders across Georgetown’s campuses have met regularly with Jewish students, faculty, and staff to discuss ways in which the University can strengthen Jewish life on campus and prevent and address antisemitism, which has led to the development and introduction of new programs, trainings, and the Community in Diversity public awareness campaign against antisemitism, Islamophobia, and all types of hate.

In January 2025, Georgetown launched mandatory educational training for more than 700 leaders of campus student organizations regarding understanding and preventing discrimination and harassment based on protected categories, including antisemitism.  Georgetown also requires all first-year undergraduate students to complete educational training regarding understanding and preventing discrimination and harassment based on religion, race, color, and national origin, including shared ancestry, such as Jewish identity. In addition, Georgetown conducted a cultural climate survey of students during the Spring 2025 term, which included questions regarding students’ sense of belonging, including related to their Jewish identity; experiences involving bias, prejudice, and discrimination, such as antisemitism; and University resources and responsiveness.

Georgetown’s Center for New Designs in Learning and Scholarship (CNDLS) has developed extensive resources to help faculty promote civil discourse and facilitate difficult discussions in the classroom. In addition, Georgetown has launched the Georgetown Dialogues Initiative (GDI) that seeks to give all Georgetown students exposure to and personal experiences in respectful dialogue between those with opposing viewpoints. Furthermore, the University released a toolkit on Engaging in Civil Discourse at Georgetown, which showcased past events and current strategies for engaging in challenging discussions with people across political ideologies, race, faith traditions, and other backgrounds.

When the April 2025 BDS referendum passed in the student government, the administration acted within 30 minutes to issue a public statement rejecting the referendum outright and reaffirming the University’s opposition to the BDS movement. In July 2025, the University removed the professor who had posted the tweet about Iran from his role as department chair, placed him on leave, and initiated a formal review.

In advance of the 2025-26 academic year, Georgetown adopted a new masking policy, addressing a growing tactic of harassment.

Criteria

Above Expectations

Publicly Disclosed Administrative Actions i

Key
Publicly Disclosed Administrative Actions
This college completely fulfills the specified criteria
This college partially fulfills the specified criteria
This college does not fulfill the specified criteria
This college was not assessed on the specified criteria.
Full ADL Criteria Details →
Antisemitism included in Code of Conduct and Policies
Clear process for reporting antisemitic incidents
Advisory council to address antisemitism/support Jewish life
Clear religious accommodations policy
Mandatory antisemitism education for students, faculty and staff
Has an official position against BDS
Publicly condemns antisemitic incidents
Partnerships with Israeli institutions
Conducts research to assess Jewish campus community experiences
Civil discourse initiatives on campus
Clear time, place and manner policies
Participated in program to address antisemitism
Excellent

Jewish Life on Campus i

Key
Jewish Life on Campus
This college completely fulfills the specified criteria
This college partially fulfills the specified criteria
This college does not fulfill the specified criteria
This college was not assessed on the specified criteria.
Full ADL Criteria Details →
Active Hillel, Chabad, or other Jewish student organization
Jewish Greek life
Jewish studies programs
Kosher dining
Interfaith initiatives on campus
School promotes awareness of Jewish holidays
Israel studies or study abroad programs
Rabbi/Jewish educator
Jewish religious services
Jewish alumni group
Has a group supporting Jewish employees
Partnerships with Jewish-allied organizations
Active pro-Israel group
Medium

Campus Conduct and Climate Concerns i

Key
Campus Conduct and Climate Concerns
This college has no recent reports of these issues
This college experiences some of these issues
This college experiences a lot of these issues

*Incident levels reflect the number of incidents relative to the total student population on campus. 'Severe' and 'other' incidents were only counted if they were recorded between January and December 2025.

Full ADL Criteria Details →
Level of severe antisemitic and anti-Zionist incidents
Level of other antisemitic and anti-Zionist incidents
Level of hostile anti-Zionist student government activity
Level of hostile anti-Zionist student groups 
Level of hostile anti-Zionist staff and faculty activity

Georgetown University contributed information to our assessment.

This page was last updated on Mar 10, 2026, 5:15 am

Campus Antisemitism Report Card > Georgetown University

Georgetown University

2024
Grade

D

Jump To

2024 Report Card

Active Jewish Life

Georgetown has a Hillel, Chabad, and Jewish Greek life organizations.

Litigation & Investigations

In July 2025, Georgetown Interim President Groves testified before the House Committee on Education and Workforce about the University’s handling of antisemitism on campus.

What’s Happening on Campus?

In February 2024, more than 100 students, faculty, and staff held a walkout on campus, calling for Georgetown to divest from companies that invest in technology used by the Israeli military. The walkout was organized by several groups, including the Georgetown Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and JVP chapters. That same month, JVP led a protest against a panel featuring Israeli Defense Forces soldiers.

In October 2024, anti-Israel graffiti was located on campus that included an inverted red triangle, a symbol associated with Hamas.

In April 2025, a BDS referendum passed in the student government with 68 percent of the student vote. That same month, a poster advertising a Jewish candidate for student government at Georgetown was vandalized with graffiti that read: "Zionist."

In June 2025, during the Iran-Israel war, a Georgetown professor posted a tweet calling on Iran to strike a U.S. military base. That same month, swastikas were found etched into pillars on the Georgetown University campus.

University Policies and Responsive Action

In Spring 2023, an external antisemitism briefing was organized for a group of administrators, including University Counsel, Office of Emergency Management, Student Equity and Inclusion, and others that advise the President.

Since October 2023, senior academic and administrative leaders across Georgetown’s campuses have met regularly with Jewish students, faculty, and staff to discuss ways in which the University can strengthen Jewish life on campus and prevent and address antisemitism, which has led to the development and introduction of new programs, trainings, and the Community in Diversity public awareness campaign against antisemitism, Islamophobia, and all types of hate.

In January 2025, Georgetown launched mandatory educational training for more than 700 leaders of campus student organizations regarding understanding and preventing discrimination and harassment based on protected categories, including antisemitism.  Georgetown also requires all first-year undergraduate students to complete educational training regarding understanding and preventing discrimination and harassment based on religion, race, color, and national origin, including shared ancestry, such as Jewish identity. In addition, Georgetown conducted a cultural climate survey of students during the Spring 2025 term, which included questions regarding students’ sense of belonging, including related to their Jewish identity; experiences involving bias, prejudice, and discrimination, such as antisemitism; and University resources and responsiveness.

Georgetown’s Center for New Designs in Learning and Scholarship (CNDLS) has developed extensive resources to help faculty promote civil discourse and facilitate difficult discussions in the classroom. In addition, Georgetown has launched the Georgetown Dialogues Initiative (GDI) that seeks to give all Georgetown students exposure to and personal experiences in respectful dialogue between those with opposing viewpoints. Furthermore, the University released a toolkit on Engaging in Civil Discourse at Georgetown, which showcased past events and current strategies for engaging in challenging discussions with people across political ideologies, race, faith traditions, and other backgrounds.

When the April 2025 BDS referendum passed in the student government, the administration acted within 30 minutes to issue a public statement rejecting the referendum outright and reaffirming the University’s opposition to the BDS movement. In July 2025, the University removed the professor who had posted the tweet about Iran from his role as department chair, placed him on leave, and initiated a formal review.

In advance of the 2025-26 academic year, Georgetown adopted a new masking policy, addressing a growing tactic of harassment.

Criteria

Publicly Disclosed Administrative Actions and Policies i

Key
Publicly Disclosed Administrative Actions and Policies
This college completely fulfills the specified criteria
This college partially fulfills the specified criteria
This college does not fulfill the specified criteria
This college was not assessed on the specified criteria.
Full ADL Criteria Details →
Antisemitism included in Code of Conduct and Policies
Clear process for reporting antisemitic incidents
Advisory council to address antisemitism/support Jewish life
Clear religious accommodations policy
Mandatory antisemitism education for students, faculty and staff
Has an official position against BDS
Publicly condemns antisemitic incidents

Jewish Life on Campus i

Key
Jewish Life on Campus
This college completely fulfills the specified criteria
This college partially fulfills the specified criteria
This college does not fulfill the specified criteria
This college was not assessed on the specified criteria.
Full ADL Criteria Details →
Active Hillel, Chabad, or other Jewish student organization
Jewish Greek life
Jewish studies programs
Kosher dining
Interfaith initiatives on campus
School promotes awareness of Jewish holidays
Israel studies or study abroad programs
Rabbi/Jewish educator
Jewish religious services

Incidents i

Key
Incidents
This college has no recent reports of these issues
This college experiences some of these issues
This college experiences a lot of these issues

*Incident levels reflect the number of incidents relative to the total student population on campus. 'Severe' and 'other' incidents were only counted if they were recorded between January and December 2025.

Full ADL Criteria Details →
Severe antisemitic and anti-Zionist incidents *
Medium
Other antisemitic and anti-Zionist incidents *
High
Hostile anti-Zionist student government activity
None
Hostile anti-Zionist student groups
High
Antisemitic speakers or programs on campus
Low

Georgetown University contributed information to our assessment.

This page was last updated on Mar 10, 2026, 5:15 am